Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼öºÒ»ç¾÷ ½Ç½Ã¿©ºÎ¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯¾ÆÀÇ ÀÏȸ ¼Òº¯°ú ¼ÕÅéÀÇ ºÒ¼Ò³óµµ ºñ±³

Fluoride concentration of spot urine and the fingernails of preschool children in a fluoridated and in a non-fluoridated community

´ëÇѱ¸°­º¸°ÇÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 33±Ç 4È£ p.544 ~ 551
±èÈñ°æ, °í¿µ¸², ¹è¼ö¸í, Á¤¼¼È¯,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÈñ°æ ( Kim Hee-Kyoung ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡Çб³½Ç
°í¿µ¸² ( Kho Young-Lim ) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ º¸°Çȯ°æ°úÇкÎ
¹è¼ö¸í ( Bae Soo-Myoung ) - ÇýÀü´ëÇÐ Ä¡À§»ý°ú
Á¤¼¼È¯ ( Jung Se-Hwan ) - °­¸ª´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Object: The purpose of this study was to examine fluoride concentration of spot urine and fingernails of preschool children in a fluoridated and non-fluoridated community and to assess the association between the two fluoride conc ntrations.

Method: Eighty five children (45 boys, 40 girls) in preschool participated in this study. For this study, we compared forty five children in a fluoridated community to forty children in a non-fluoridated community. While fluoride concentration of spot urine was directly analyzed by a fluoride ion specific electrode, on fingernails was analyzed on the same matching after pre-processing by hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDS) diffusion method. Data were analyzed by Student¡¯s t-test and Pearson correlation analysis.

Result: The fluoride concentration of spot urine was 1.06¡¾0.49 §¶/g in a fluoridated community and 0.51¡¾0.41 §¶/g in the non-fluoridated community (p <.001). The fluoride concentration of fingernails was 6.43¡¾3.98 §¶/g in a fluoridated community and 4.06¡¾2.74 §¶/g in non-fluoridated community (p<.001). The correlation coefficeint between the 2 fluoride concentrations was 0.257 (p <.05).

Conclusion: We found the possibility of a fluoride concentration monitoring system by using spot urine and the fingernails of preschool children in fluoridated community.

Å°¿öµå

ºÒ¼Ò;¼ÕÅé;¼öºÒ»ç¾÷;À¯¾Æ;ÀÏȸ ¼Òº¯
Fingernails;Fluoride;Preschool children;Spot urine;Water fluoridation

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed